Supreme Court could hear whooping crane case

San Antonio Express-News

By Scott Huddleston

January 2, 2015 Updated: January 2, 2015 10:34pm

FOTWW - Whooper eating crab San Antonio Press

Photo: Associated Press

A senior U.S. district judge in 2013 found that the TCEQ “proximately caused” the deaths of at least 23 whooping cranes.

A federal court ruling in favor of the state in the deaths of endangered whooping cranes that migrate from Canada to Texas for the winter could soon be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Aransas Project, a nonprofit environmental group that won its case in a federal district court in Corpus Christi in 2013 but had it reversed last year, now has until mid-March to file an appeal with the nation’s highest court. Jim Blackburn, a Houston environmental lawyer and the group’s lead counsel, said a recent 11-4 split among judges of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans and a dissenting opinion written by a former San Antonio judge bode well for the likelihood that the Supreme Court will hear his appeal.

To read the entire article, click here: San Antonio News

 ***** FOTWW’s mission is to help preserve and protect the Aransas/Wood Buffalo
population of wild whooping cranes and their habitat. *****
Friends of the Wild Whoopers is a nonprofit 501(c)3 organization. logo

Private Lands Important to Whooping Cranes Wintering On Texas Coast

by Felipe Chavez-Ramirez, PhD, Director, Conservation Programs, Gulf Coast Bird Observatory

Whooping Cranes are Rare Birds

Whooping Cranes are a highly endangered species and is one of the rarest birds on the planet.   Currently the population numbers about 300 individuals, however, that population has shown a slow but steady increase since 1941 when only 16 individuals remained. Whooping cranes are migratory, spending the winter on the Texas coast and breeding in the Northwest Territories of Canada in Wood Buffalo National Park. The original wild population maintains winter territories in salt marshes in and around Aransas National Wildlife Refuge. As the Whooping Crane population has increased they have expanded their winter range so that today, only about half of the winter range is within these protected areas of Aransas and Matagorda Island National Wildlife Refuges.

Whooping Crane Recovery Team Identifies Limiting Factor

Whooping cranes often use habitat on private lands in the general area of Aransas National Wildlife Refuge.
Whooping cranes often use habitat on private lands in the general area of Aransas National Wildlife Refuge.

As members of the Whooping Crane Recovery Team, we have identified winter habitat as the limiting factor to increasing the population of this wild, migratory species. In addition, a multi-organization, multi-agency, bi-national Conservation Action Plan highlights that a plan to ensure protection of all current and future potential Whooping Crane wintering habitats a high priority.  Since more than half of the Whooping Crane population winters on private lands – and in the future the percentage is likely to increase, finding mechanism to ensure the integrity of those lands as Whooping Crane habitat is a high priority. A recent evaluation conducted in conjunction with the International Crane Foundation and Harte Research Institute, shows that potential high quality habitat along the coast in Aransas, San Antonio, and Matagorda Bay systems will be a smaller proportion of potential territories within protected areas in the future. As little as 26% of all potential suitable winter habitat for Whooping Cranes will be within a protected area in the mentioned bay systems.

Reintroduced Populations Have Not Succeeded To-date

The importance of protecting actual and potential wild Whooping Crane wintering grounds has taken greater significance in recent years as attempts to establish reintroduced populations have not succeeded in establishing self- sustaining populations in other areas. Under the conditions outlined in the Whooping Crane Recovery Plan for potential down listing is that if no self-sustaining reintroduced populations have been established then at least 250 breeding pairs (1,000 individuals) should be in the wild population. This means that we need to ensure that at least there is sufficient acres to support 250 breeding pairs on the Texas coasts.

How Can Whooping Cranes on private lands survive?

There are potential conservation issues that must be considered when such a large proportion of the Whooping Crane population will be spending the winter on non-protected lands. Human activity on private lands is greater, generally unrestricted, and may pose actual or potential threats to wintering Whooping Cranes. Whooping Cranes on private lands may be exposed to direct and detrimental threats.  For example, disturbance factors associated with roads, boating, and hunting. In the past 3 years there have been at least 10 direct shootings and killings of Whooping Cranes while on their wintering grounds, in migration, and within the reintroduced populations. While direct killing was considered a serious problem in the past it was not considered to be a conservation issue at present until recently. Indirect impacts are present that may affect the availability of potential wintering habitat as many areas along the Texas coast are prime areas for urban developments, for example. So we must keep trying to understand and find ways to ensure that Whooping Cranes on private lands can survive in the future.

Many Groups Involved

Many groups and organizations are interested in the conservation and protection of wintering Whooping Crane habitat. At present we collaborate on different projects with The Bi-National Whooping Crane Recovery Team, The International Crane Foundation, The Nature Conservancy, Audubon Society, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Service, Canadian Wildlife Service, Parks Canada, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, and others.

Figure Legend – Mapping of potential Whooping Crane habitat in and around Aransas and Matagorda Island National Wildlife Refuges shows that only about 27% of potential wintering habitat is within protected area boundaries, while 73% is on private lands (from Smith et al. 2014).


**** Friends of the Wild Whoopers wholeheartedly endorses this important article by Dr. Felipe Chavez-Ramirez. We strongly believe that there must be renewed, robust focus on the Aransas-Wood Buffalo population of Whooping Cranes. Our call for renewed focus on this original population is in no way is intended to denigrate other Whooping Crane projects. The Aransas-Wood Buffalo population is the only self-sustaining population on the planet. All the other worthy Whooping Crane projects have originated from the Aransas-Wood Buffalo population. We simply must pay more attention to this most viable population that has continued to increase in numbers since the 1940s. Wild Whooping Cranes have proven that they can take care of themselves if they have suitable habitat. Habitat is the key.

Chester McConnell, President
Friends of the Wild Whoopers

***** FOTWW’s mission is to help preserve and protect the Aransas/Wood Buffalo
population of wild whooping cranes and their habitat
. ***** logo



Wood Buffalo Whooping Crane Chick Survival Rate

The only surviving self-sustaining migratory population of wild whooping cranes nests in Wood Buffalo National Park (WBNP) in Northern Alberta. Their breeding grounds are an area of boreal spruce forest growing on narrow ridges. (Figure 1.) The adult whooper pairs that nest there protect their hatchling chicks in accordance with some natural traits that man does not fully understand. The adults, and especially the young, face many difficulties.

Figure 1.   Whooping crane nesting habitat on Wood Buffalo.                   Photo by Klaus Nigge
Figure 1. Whooping crane nesting habitat on Wood Buffalo. Note whooping crane on nest left-center of photo. Photo by Klaus Nigge

Every year WBNP’s staff and the Canadian Wildlife Service join together to do two aerial surveys on the whoopers nesting grounds. In June the first survey is made to count the number of whooping crane nest. The second survey is made in August to determine the number of chicks that fledged (capable of flying).

WBNP officials reported that during 2014 that the survey team counted a record of 82 nest in June and 32 fledgling whooping cranes during August. In 2013, the survey team spotted 74 nests in the spring and 28 fledglings later in the summer. “That gives a success rate of about 40% when compared to how many fledglings we have when compared with the number of nests they started out with in the spring”, according to Stuart McMillan, Manager, Resource Conservation, WBNP. The success rate is based on an assumption of the survival of one chick per nest (more on this later).  The surveyors observed 28 pairs with one fledgling chick, and two families with two fledgling chicks during 2014. Friends of the Wild Whoopers regards the 32 fledglings as a very good survival level.

So, what happened to the nest or chicks that may have hatched between the June and August surveys? Sixty percent of the nest did not produce chicks or, if they did, those chicks did not survive until the August survey.

The Aransas/Wood Buffalo population of whooping cranes needs many things in order to survive and reproduce. They need suitable breeding grounds, a reliable food source, an unpolluted habitat, a safe migration path and a healthy wintering area. Based on biological evaluations, WBNP does provide suitable, unpolluted breeding grounds with a reliable food source. So what are the limiting factors that caused either a 60 % nest failure or chick deaths between the June and August surveys?

Eggs are normally laid in late April to mid-May, and hatching occurs about one month later. The incubation period is from 29 to 31 days.  Around 90% of the clutches contain two eggs.  Whooping cranes may re-nest if their first clutch is destroyed or lost before mid-incubation.  Egg predation is believed to be uncommon at Wood Buffalo NP, and re-nesting has only been documented a few times.

Figure 2.  Raven taking egg from whooping crane nest on Wood Buffalo.  Photo by Klaus Nigge
Figure 2. Raven taking egg from whooping crane nest on Wood Buffalo.    Photo by Klaus Nigge

There are several animals that prey on the eggs and young of whooping cranes.  Some examples are the American black bear, wolverine, red fox, gray wolf, lynx, bald eagle, golden eagle and raven. Adult whooping cranes have very few predators because of their large size.While the listed critters are potential nest predators, they are rarely a threat to adult whoopers.

Figure 3. Raven flying away holding leg of whooping in egg. Photo by Klaus Nigge
Figure 3. Raven flying away holding leg of whooping crane chick while chick is still in egg.    Photo by Klaus Nigge

The cranes build their nests in shallow waters as one means of protection.  While in water it is more difficult for predators to catch adult whoopers unaware. Yet, while on land, it is easier for stealthy predators to creep up on them. Overall impact of predation on recruitment remains uncertain.

Chicks are particularly vulnerable until they are about 3 months old when they fledge (begin to fly). They are even more vulnerable in dry summers when water levels are low and nesting areas are more accessible to predators.

Whooping crane parents remain alert for evidence of predators and alarm calls may be given at sight of large predators.  And, the parents may approach and threaten or attack small predators such as red fox. They may also give a distraction display toward a large predator such as a bear or wolf. Yet, the best efforts of the adults are not always successful in saving their chicks from predators.

Figure 4. Red  foxes on Wood Buffalo may raid nest or catch chicks.  Photo by Ronnie Schaefer
Figure 4. Red foxes on Wood Buffalo may raid nest or catch chicks. Photo by Ronnie Schaefer

From the time whooping crane chicks are hatched to the time they are adults, chicks and juveniles face many hazards. They may face death from predators, injuries, inadequate food and sickness. Scientists working with the cranes have estimated that approximately one-third, or less, of wild whooping crane chicks survive from hatching to breeding age.

So, again, what has happened to the nest or chicks that may have hatched between the June and August surveys? The answer is that we do not know precisely. But a research study performed from 1997 to 1999 provides some of the best information available to help us understand. That part of WBNP where the whooping cranes nest and rear their young is a huge wetland area. It is difficult to move around in the wetlands and to cover sufficient territory to perform detailed biological studies to learn about whooping crane problems. So, what we do know at this time is based on a few, but very informative biological studies and general observations on a sample of the whooping crane population.

A study of the survival and death rates of whooping crane colts (chicks) in WBNP was accomplished by personnel of Parks Canada and Canadian Wildlife Service from 1997 to 1999. The purpose of the study was to provide baseline information on causes of chick mortality and to gain information on why few whooping crane twins survive. Researchers used intensive aerial monitoring, ground observations and radio-telemetry to monitor twenty-two whooping crane pairs that had twin chicks in WBNP.

Transmitters were attached to 18 chicks hatched by the 22 adult pairs.  Five (28%) of the chicks fledged (capable of flying); five (28%) succumbed to cumulative effects (head trauma, stress, exposure and infection); four (22%) were lost to unknown causes (three of these went missing after they had lost their transmitters).

Research personnel believed two chicks (11%) had been taken by a fox (Vulpes vulpes), one (5.5%) was lost to raven (Corvus corax) predation, and one (5.5%) died of pneumonia. Out of the 22 sets of twins monitored, one set of twins survived the summer. On another occasion the older sibling was taken by a fox and the younger chick survived. This resulted in 9% of the smaller sibling chicks surviving. Chicks being monitored that went missing did so between 7 and 22 days following hatching.

Interestingly, the researchers observed that most often it is the younger (smaller) sibling chicks that go missing for several reasons.  The first chick to hatch (from the 2 eggs in a nest) is at least 2 days older and is heavier. The older chick displays severe aggression by repeatedly pecking the younger one, sometimes causing injury (head trauma, stress and infection). Then, the family groups depart the nest pond soon after the 2nd egg hatches and is on the move for the first week following hatching. All of these factors work together in wearing down most of the smaller sibling chicks and within 2 weeks the younger chick has perished or is unable to keep up with the family group and gets abandoned. Such natural conduct  is distressing  for humans to comprehend.

Based on their study the researchers determined several factors work against twins whooping crane chicks surviving. These include direct causes like predation from foxes and ravens, and indirect causes such as trauma (which the researchers believe to be primarily the result of sibling aggression), exposure and infection.

The research team wrote: “We believe the following scenario may be common in WBNP. Once the second eggs hatches, the older sibling displays aggression towards the younger colt, this aggression can be severe at the nest site as the colts are confined to a small area. The adults depart the nest pond when the younger colt is approximately two days old and the physical demands involved in keeping pace with the family wears down the younger colt. Over time the younger colt becomes weaker, lags behind and becomes vulnerable to predators or eventually is abandoned. While this may be the case generally, we did have two occasions where the younger colt fledged. We believe that the second (younger) colt acts as insurance in case the older colt dies in the first critical weeks of life. We believe that every wild whooping crane recruited into the Aransas-WBNP wild population is critical to the survival of this population and the long-term viability of the species. We therefore recommend that it is necessary to leave nests in WBNP with two eggs and let natural selection work to increase the fitness of the only self-sustaining wild population of whooping cranes in the world.”

by Chester McConnell, Friends of the Wild Whoopers

***** FOTWW’s mission is to help preserve and protect the Aransas/Wood Buffalo population of
wild whooping cranes and their habitat
. ***** logo








Whooping Crane group challenges Texas river water interests

Friends of the Wild Whoopers (FOTWW) is issuing a challenge to legal minds and officials to offer solutions to resolve river flow dilemmas in Texas to save endangered whooping cranes.  Whooping cranes are the symbol of conservation in North America. These beautiful birds stand 5 feet tall and are treasures to many thousands of people in the U.S. and other countries. Yet these magnificent birds are facing increasing threats. FOTWW wants to know if law firms or government agencies informed about the issue care enough to lend a helping hand?

FOTWW would appreciate receiving legally binding recommendations to help in this cause. Several law firms that wrote their thoughts about the“The Aransas Project v. Shaw” court suit  should certainly have ideas for a reasonable solution/compromise. Please email your thoughts to: or fill out our  contact form. With your permission we would post your recommendations on our web site: . Honest, considerate debate will be appreciated. This request for recommendations has no connection to the ongoing legal appeal Aransas Project v. Shaw. For background on the situation, please continue reading.

Two whooping cranes feeding in wetland.
Two whooping cranes feeding in wetland.

Approximately 304 endangered whooping cranes currently make their fall and winter home on the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge on the Texas coast. Every spring they migrate 2,500 miles north to Wood Buffalo National Park, Canada where they nest and rear their young chicks. Whooping cranes have been following this schedule for centuries.

When Europeans came to North America the situation began to change for whooping cranes. The new settlers had fire arms and killed the whoopers for food more effectively than the Indians before them. Even worse, settlers drained wetland sites used by the cranes as habitat. Millions of acres of whooper habitat were destroyed and converted to cities and agricultural fields.

As a result of man’s deeds whooping crane populations plummeted. They were eradicated from their habitats along the Atlantic coast, much of the Gulf of Mexico coast and vast areas of the northern United States and Canadian prairies.

In the early 1940’s, their numbers declined to a low of 15 on the Texas coast and 6 on the Louisiana coast. The last crane in Louisiana was captured in 1950 and relocated to Aransas Refuge where it died a year later. Then only 15 wild whooping cranes remained. These birds were the last of the only remaining self-sustaining flock of whooping cranes on the planet. After recognizing that whooping cranes were about to become extinct conservation interests worked with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to reverse the downward trend. Their efforts were successful and the whooper population has slowly increased over the past 70 years to approximately 304 birds.

Fresh water is necessary for a healthy environment in the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge complex. photo by Jim Foster
Fresh water is necessary for a healthy environment in the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge complex.                                                          photo by Jim Foster

Unfortunately, alarming signs of trouble are once again threatening whooping cranes. As the U.S. human population has increased more habitats used by the cranes has been destroyed and degraded. And now the huge human population growth and development in Texas is using ever increasing quantities of fresh water.

There are 7,400 dams in Texas. 4,700 of these dams create reservoirs having a surface area greater than 5 acres. Corps of Engineers map.
There are 7,400 dams in Texas. 4,700 of these dams create reservoirs having a surface area greater than 5 acres. Corps of Engineers map.  Click on the map to enlarge.

According to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, there are 7,400 dams in Texas. A total of 4,700 of these dams create reservoirs having a surface area greater than 5 acres. The volume of the 4,700 – 5 acre or larger lakes/reservoirs totals 1,988,801,388 acre-feet and a surface area of 2,269,900 acres. These lakes/reservoirs have many benefits but they do reduce the natural stream flows reaching estuaries and have adverse impacts on these important areas.

Less and less fresh water is being allowed to flow downstream into estuaries along the gulf coast. The inflows of fresh water mixing with sea water provides high levels of nutrients in both the water column and sediment, making estuaries among the most productive natural habitats in the world. With reduced inflows of fresh river waters however, estuaries are suffering.

Healthy estuaries associated with San Antonio Bay, Matagorda Bay and Copana Bay within the Aransas Refuge complex are essential to whooping cranes. Estuaries along this area of the coast produce the foods for whooping cranes and numerous other species. Without the proper mix of fresh water and salt water, life in the estuaries declines to a point that wild critters depending on the normal situation starve or become unhealthy and do not reproduce.

FOTWW requests that individuals, law firms and agency officials offer their advice for legal solutions/compromise to assure that Texas Commission on Environmental Quality adopts and enforces appropriate environmental flow standards for the Guadalupe and San Antonio River basins. This is essential in order for the San Antonio Bay system to adequately support a sound ecological environment to the maximum extent reasonable considering other public interests and other relevant factors. Also there is a need to establish an amount of unappropriated water, if available, to be set aside to satisfy the environmental flow standards to the maximum extent reasonable when considering human water needs.

by Chester McConnell, FOTWW

***** FOTWW’s mission is to help preserve and protect the Aransas/Wood Buffalo population of
wild whooping cranes and their habitat
. ***** logo